Thursday, July 7, 2011

THE PLUTOCRACY OF HYPOCRISY Vs Scientific Socialism, and or Communism

THE PLUTOCRACY OF HYPOCRISY Vs Scientific Socialism, and or Communism

 

 

[HTS] in reply to Life after capitalism Robert Skidelsky, a member of the British House of Lords, is professor emeritus of Political Economy at Warwick University, author of a prize-winning biography of the economist John Maynard Keynes.

 

 

[Robert Skidelsky Says]: The dishonoring of greed is likely only in those countries whose citizens already have more than they need. And even there, many people still have less than they need.

 

 

[HTS REPLYS]: The word in the Plutocracy of modern Capitalism is no longer a need of the type one would really consider it to mean, it has evolved into more of being a stung out junkie, the thrill of each high only leaves the user with the craving to have more, they don't just need public transportation, they need private transportation, and then its the latest and greatest model of private transportation, not a simple form or mode needed for the area of use but one that makes a statement, it does not matter if the speed limit is [55MPH] Miles Per Hour, the vehicle must have the ability to beat any vehicle ever made, and say it can do it, just by its make and model. Everything is reduced to economic eye candy, its comes down to school yard one ups man ship, control is end game, Politically, Socially, Militarily, and Economically. 

 

 

[Robert Skidelshy Says]: The evidence suggests that economies would be more stable and citizens happier if wealth and income were more evenly distributed. The economic justification for large income inequalities – the need to stimulate people to be more productive – collapses when growth ceases to be so important.

 

 

[HTS REPLYS]: The evidence of Communist or Scientific Socialism would support that in the end not only would the [Regional Spheres of Influence] be more stable and their citizens much happier if the Worlds Wealth and Income were more evenly distributed, but would be safer in the longer term, form Plutocracy Capitalisms Wars or Economic Stimulus, which grows out of the need to gain access and control of resources need to produce the ever increasing demands of the [1%] of the American - Israeli Military Industrial Complex, the [EMPIRE] to continue its exploitation of the past decades as deep as possible into the [21st] Century. 

 

 

[Robert Skidelshy Says]: Perhaps socialism was not an alternative to capitalism, but its heir. It will inherit the earth not by dispossessing the rich of their property, but by providing motives and incentives for behavior that are unconnected with the further accumulation of wealth.

 

 

[HTS REPLYS]: The concept of shaming the rich and powerful into change have not, does not, and will not be the cause of a change in their behavior anymore than the taught of legal forms brought against them in some court or tribunal, the answer to the verdict is always the same, now try to enforce it. The social revolutions of the [ME] Middle East were not [24hrs] in the making and will take at least a decade to unfold, they like so many before were in works long before they erupted, all the signs were there to be seen if one but looked and were able to understand the dynamics of change that were coming. One but needs only too look to the [EU] European Union of today, and see that change is coming with growing signs of social unrest and disunity among its [NATO] North Atlantic Treaty Organization Members, let alone its [EU] membership heading increasingly towards their breaking point. Revolutions are not a picnic they like the tree of liberty must often be nurtured with the blood of valiant. 

 

 

HERCULE TRIATHLON SAVINIEN 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.